-
FlexPro
- Auf einen Blick
- Features & Optionen
- Einsatzgebiete
- Alle Vorteile
- Neu in FlexPro 2021
- FlexPro gratis testen
- FlexPro View OEM Freeware
- Kaufberatung
- Login
- Language
- +49 6894 929600
- infoweisang.com
- Google Maps
- Produkte
- News
- Support
- Unternehmen
- Jobs
- Kontakt
- Login
- Language
- +49 6894 929600
- infoweisang.com
- Google Maps
2-D Diagram vs. Worksheet
- Dieses Thema hat 2 Antworten sowie 2 Teilnehmer und wurde zuletzt vor vor 20 Jahren, 1 Monat von paulwarshawsky@yahoo.com aktualisiert.
-
AutorBeiträge
-
November 23, 2004 um 1:42 am Uhr #12673paulwarshawsky@yahoo.comMitglied
I am working to analyze 4-5 physiologic signals recorded over several hours at 100 hz (a lot of data.) I need to display all the signals and scroll through them. I usually like to see 30 sec of data per page. I’m having a hard time deciding whether to use a 2-d diagram or a worksheet. I’ll present what I think are the advantages and disadvantages of each. I can code the missing features for each option, but I want to start off with the right decision:
Worksheet:
Advantage:
Scrolling features built in
Can activate the signal I am most interested in analyzingDisadvantage:
Can’t easily save a snapshot of the screen as a 2-d graph for presentation purposes (easiest to print it to a .PDF, but then limited ability to edit it after)
Changes made to one pane don’t reliable affect all panes – for example if I manually change the scaling of the x axis on the top pane, the other panes don’t change as well (even if zoom in sync is set)2-D Diagram:
Advantage:
All panes properly sync’d
Can easily save a snapshot for presentationDisadvantage:
No scrolling built in – would have to create macros to navigate through the signalAny suggestions?
Paul
November 23, 2004 um 2:27 am Uhr #8336paulwarshawsky@yahoo.comMitgliedI am working to analyze 4-5 physiologic signals recorded over several hours at 100 hz (a lot of data.) I need to display all the signals and scroll through them. I usually like to see 30 sec of data per page. I’m having a hard time deciding whether to use a 2-d diagram or a worksheet. I’ll present what I think are the advantages and disadvantages of each. I can code the missing features for each option, but I want to start off with the right decision:
Worksheet:
Advantage:
Scrolling features built in
Can activate the signal I am most interested in analyzingDisadvantage:
Can’t easily save a snapshot of the screen as a 2-d graph for presentation purposes (easiest to print it to a .PDF, but then limited ability to edit it after)
Changes made to one pane don’t reliable affect all panes – for example if I manually change the scaling of the x axis on the top pane, the other panes don’t change as well (even if zoom in sync is set)2-D Diagram:
Advantage:
All panes properly sync’d
Can easily save a snapshot for presentationDisadvantage:
No scrolling built in – would have to create macros to navigate through the signalAny suggestions?
Paul
November 23, 2004 um 2:27 am Uhr #9107Bernhard KantzTeilnehmerThe worksheet is not an alternative to a 2d-diagram, instead it is a container for one or more linked or embedded diagrams (similar to a document). Its purpose is to display multiple diagrams in one window and to synchronize the cursors between diagrams.
From the Automation point of view, a diagram and a worksheet are both “cursor objects”. In case of a worksheet, this object is managing the cusrors for up to 8 panes containing individual diagrams. In case of a diagram it is managing just its own cursors. If you use a worksheet, you can of course access each individual diagram within that.
Both alternatives do allow scrolling and zooming. In case of a diagram, the cursors must be enabled whereas in case of a worksheet the cursors are always enabled.
To syncronize zooming in a worksheet, you need to use the zoom between cursor function instead of manipulating the axis directly.
-
AutorBeiträge
- Du musst angemeldet sein, um auf dieses Thema antworten zu können.